SoftReply is live in beta — email, chat and phone carry real traffic today.Try it out →
COMPARE

SoftReply vs Front, honestly.

Best for operations-heavy teams that manage shared inboxes collaboratively across many channels with a strong email feel.

SoftReplyFront
AI reply workflowDrafts every reply; a named human approves before send. Autonomy opt-in per mailbox.Autopilot resolves autonomously and Copilot assists — you pick what to automate, rather than every draft passing a named approver.
PhoneAI receptionist answers, fills a call form, files recording + transcript as a ticket.Voice via telephony partners (Aircall, Dialpad); human agents, not an AI receptionist.
Audit trailApprover name on every send; source fact number and confidence on every AI-drafted send.Real admin audit log on every plan (365 days) — settings and teammate changes, not AI-approver / source-fact / confidence per send.
Data residencyEU by default; bring your own AWS SES for outbound email.US or EEA hosting on request — a region setting, not per-message control; no bring-your-own infrastructure.
CRM + sequencesBuilt in — not a separate product.Contact management only; CRM + sequences via its integrations library.
Every row is checked against the vendor's own public product docs, last on 22 July 2026; no pricing rows, since those move too often. These products ship fast — if a row has gone out of date, tell us and we will correct it.

Choose Front if…

Pick Front if collaborative, human-to-human email and inbox workflows across teams — ops, logistics, account management — matter more than heavy automation. It shines when replies are relationship-driven and you want a shared inbox that still feels like email.

Moving from Front? Conversations and contacts export via the Front API, so import is supported.
See every channel in one reviewed inbox.
Start free